SR
Sitio Royalties Corp. (STR)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2025 was operationally steady but financially softer: total revenue was $145.659M, net income $14.548M, diluted EPS $0.08, and Adjusted EBITDA $125.419M; realized oil price fell to $63.03/bbl from $70.39 in Q1, compressing margins sequentially .
- Sitio returned $0.42 per share in Q2 (dividend $0.36 plus $0.06 via buybacks), repurchasing ~0.5M shares; cumulative capital returned since 2022 exceeded $980M .
- Management discontinued guidance and cancelled the investor call due to the pending all-stock sale to Viper Energy; the merger is expected to close in Q3 2025, a key stock catalyst near term .
- Operational activity stayed resilient: 8.7 net wells turned-in-line; line-of-sight wells ended at 48.1, with Permian basins (Delaware/Midland) driving volumes; total Q2 production averaged 41.9 Mboe/d (46% oil) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Cash returns and buybacks remained disciplined: $0.42/share in Q2, including $0.36 dividend and $8.9M buybacks (~0.5M shares at $16.30/share) .
- Operational visibility: LOS wells totaled 48.1 (27.6 net spuds; 20.5 net permits) and 8.7 net wells turned-in-line, reinforcing near-term production confidence .
- Management reiterated minerals model resiliency and superior margins in prior calls: “LTM adjusted EBITDA margins were 90%” and free cash flow margins per unit “more than 3x” E&P peers, highlighting defensiveness amid price volatility .
What Went Wrong
- Sequential financial softness: Q2 revenue ($145.659M) and EPS ($0.08) declined versus Q1 ($163.515M, $0.13), driven mainly by lower realized oil prices ($63.03/bbl vs $70.39/bbl) .
- Year-over-year compression: total revenues fell versus Q2 2024 ($168.548M → $145.659M) and net income contracted ($29.041M → $14.548M) as realized combined pricing per boe dropped ($46.36 → $36.95) .
- Guidance visibility removed: due to the Viper transaction, STR withdrew forward guidance and did not host a Q2 call, limiting near-term estimate anchors and public commentary .
Financial Results
Notes: Adjusted EBITDA margin and Net Income margin are derived from reported Adjusted EBITDA and Revenues, and Net Income and Revenues, respectively (citations indicate source figures).
Realized commodity prices and production
Segment breakdown (production by basin, boe/d)
KPIs and capital returns
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “LTM adjusted EBITDA margins were 90%… 2025 free cash flow margins on a per unit of production basis are more than 3x that of the average E&P peer.” — CEO Chris Conoscenti, Q1 call prepared remarks .
- “We continue to generate significant free cash flow to support our dividend, opportunistic share buybacks, debt paydown and accretive acquisitions.” — Q1 earnings release highlights .
- “Our balanced capital structure… helped ensure financial flexibility, ample liquidity and access to future capital at attractive rates.” — Q4 call prepared remarks .
- Q2 release highlighted: no conference call and discontinuation of guidance given pending Viper merger .
Q&A Highlights
- Production trajectory: Near-term volumes underpinned by existing producing and spud wells; management has not seen completions deferred for spud wells in current environment .
- Buybacks vs M&A: Steeper buyback grid at lower share prices; remaining authorization ~$350M; M&A remains active with improved underwriting visibility vs 2020 cycle .
- Natural gas and inventory: Added 40 net normalized locations (50/50 Delaware/Midland) from Lower Wolfcamp and Bone Spring delineation; mineral ownership optionality supports long-term value .
- Operator strategies: Mixed approaches (some cutting CapEx but maintaining production or increasing wells online); minerals viewed as multi-decade call on hydrocarbons .
- Guidance cadence: Q1 production above guide; management historically revisits after Q2, but subsequently removed guidance amid merger .
Estimates Context
- S&P Global consensus estimates were unavailable via our system for STR due to a mapping issue; as a result, vs-estimate comparisons for Q2 2025 cannot be provided. If desired, we can update once the SPGI mapping is resolved (consensus fields would carry the “Values retrieved from S&P Global” disclaimer).
- Management noted Q1 2025 results beat consensus “from production down to net income,” implying prior-quarter estimate alignment was favorable; no similar statement was issued for Q2 given the absence of a call and guidance withdrawal .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near-term: Expect muted disclosure and limited guidance until the Viper transaction closes; focus on the merger timeline as the primary stock catalyst in Q3 2025 .
- Operations: LOS inventory and steady TILs support stable production into H2; activity concentrated in Delaware/Midland supports margin quality .
- Financials: Sequential revenue/EPS decline was largely price-driven; with combined realized price/boe down, Adjusted EBITDA margin remained high but compressed vs Q2 2024 .
- Capital return: Dividend and buybacks remain central; Q2 returned $0.42/share with continued repurchases, signaling ongoing capital allocation discipline despite softer pricing .
- Strategy: Minerals model’s high-margin, non-cost-bearing nature and diversified operator base continue to differentiate STR’s cash generation profile across commodity cycles .
- Medium term: Natural gas macro (power demand/data centers) and ongoing Permian development provide optionality; midstream expansions help mitigate basis risks .
- Post-merger lens: If/when the Viper deal closes, reassess forward metrics, dividend/buyback framework, and combined LOS/inventory to recalibrate the thesis under the new capital structure .